My median estimate sits just below 1.0 (0.96), reflecting an expectation of roughly constant or slightly accelerating efficiency doublings. Evaluated alongside related indicators, the projected 4.6x improvement in sample efficiency supports the view of consistently sustained, rather than radically accelerated, algorithmic progress. A major factor anchoring and slightly tightening the distribution near 1.0 is the likelihood of a methodological artifact: i
Evaluated alongside related indicators, the estimate held steady as the projected 4.6x improvement in sample efficiency supports the view of consistently sustained, rather than radically accelerated, algorithmic progress.
Establishing the 2026 baseline relies heavily on vendor revenue disclosures and run rates, as labs do not publish exact human-data spending. The top five frontier developers likely spend an aggregate of $5–10 billion in calendar 2026. This is built from major vendor footprints: Mercor reached a ~$2 billion gross run rate by mid-2026 with ~90% tied to foundation-model labs Mercor revenue, valuation & funding | Sacra[Mercor revenue, valuation & funding | Sacra](https
Set against related questions, the distribution was adjusted slightly to account for the dampening effect that a projected 4.6x improvement in sample efficiency may have on human-data budgets.
Forecast Summary & Core Dynamics I estimate the token count required to reach a fixed capability level will fall by a median factor of 4.6x between 2026 and 2031, with an interquartile range of 2.4x to 9.5x and a wide 80% confidence interval ranging from 1.3x to 22.0x. Evaluating this question alongside related estimates of compute efficiency doublings and structural data constraints reinforces the median while reflecting, particularly in the interquartile range, a fundamental tension betwee
Set against related questions on training bottlenecks, the distribution was slightly compressed because parallel expectations of a 2.8x increase in human data spending suggest labs will rely somewhat more on brute-force data than pure algorithmic efficiency.
Ask a followup
Sign in to run · $20 free credit, no card · every claim cited