What will be the outcome of Florida AG's September 28, 2026 motion for a preliminary/temporary injunction against OpenAI in State of Florida v. OpenAI (Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Highlands County, FL)?

rationale:

The most likely outcomes for the September 28, 2026 preliminary injunction motion are that it remains pending (28%) or is partially granted on narrower grounds (24%), followed by a full denial (21%), settlement (11%), substantial grant (10%), and other procedural resolutions (6%).<br><br>Initial logic and parameters regarding the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and procedural hurdles are validated. The foundational context regarding OpenAI's voluntary pause 2 sources, First Amendment challenges news.bloomberglaw.com, and the extraordinary nature of the core requests news.bloomberglaw.com establishes the baseline legal constraints.<br><br>Consequently, the court will overwhelmingly reject the core demands to halt model development or ban minors outright. Bypassing standard litigation pacing, the six-month window heavily favors procedural exhaustion, elevating 'still pending' to the modal outcome.<br><br>If a ruling materializes, the AG-friendly FDUTPA framework myfloridalegal.com immediately dictates a partial grant on conventional under-13 data or misrepresentation rules, cleanly severing the constitutionally dubious core requests from standard consumer protection measures.